By John Hagan
Read Online or Download Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2007 Vol 3) PDF
Best law books
"If you've received not anything to hide," many folks say, "you shouldn't fear approximately govt surveillance. " Others argue that we needs to sacrifice privateness for safeguard. yet as Daniel J. Solove argues during this very important ebook, those arguments and so on are wrong. they're in response to unsuitable perspectives approximately what it capacity to guard privateness and the prices and merits of doing so.
This publication is an leading edge contribution to analytical jurisprudence. it truly is as a rule in response to the precise premises of linguistic philosophy and Carnapian semantics, but in addition addresses the problems of institutional philosophy, social pragmatism, and felony rules as anticipated through Dworkin, between others.
Additional resources for Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2007 Vol 3)
Soc. Sci. 3:21-43. org by Neyer Zapata on 11/10/07. For personal use only. ANRV327-LS03-02 34 Espeland · Vannebo otherwise would be difﬁcult to grasp (Sunstein 2000). Others see it as an important means of disciplining agencies (Posner 2002). Yet CBA shares some of the same biases as sentencing guidelines. In forcing value to be expressed as price, CBA favors things for which prices are readily available and naturalized (Ackerman & Heinzerling 2002). Although a range of techniques for nonmarket valuation have been devised, they remain controversial.
Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press Heinzerling L. 2000. The rights of statistical people. Harvard Environ. Law Rev. 24(1):189–207 Hofer PJ, Blackwell KR, Ruback RB. 1999. The effect of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines on inter-judge sentencing disparity. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 90(1):239–322 Hoffer TB. 2000. Accountability in education. In Handbook of the Sociology of Education, ed. MT Hallinan, pp. 529–43. /Plenum Hutchins E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Boston: MIT Press Koh SY. 1992. Reestablishing the federal judge’s role in sentencing.
The prisoner’s dilemma quality to rankings generates enormous pressure to scrutinize the rankings, scrutinize the schools with similar rankings, and be innovative and expansive in generating organizational statistics. It also makes collective action harder to accomplish. The media play a crucial role by amplifying the effects of rankings, often by reinforcing their tendency to become selffulﬁlling prophecies. As media products, rankings started with broad circulation and then expanded further as they became news reported by other media.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2007 Vol 3) by John Hagan